Carol Zhao vs Alana Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jul at 09:28 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Zhao vs A. Smith

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zhao 1 - 0 Smith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carol Zhao winning 2 and Alana Smith winning 0. The last match between Carol Zhao and Alana Smith was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 11-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Grass, with Carol Zhao getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zhao | 1 |
Smith | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Hall of Fame Open - Newport(07-11-25)
C. Zhao vs A. Smith H2H Profile
C. Zhao vs A. Smith Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the last six months, Zhao slightly edges Smith, winning 39.76% of points compared to Smith's 39.41% on their second serve. Could this narrow margin be decisive?
- Return Game Stats: Zhao shows a stronger return game, securing 52.66% of opponents' second serve points versus Smith's 49.33%. They also outperform Smith on first serve returns with 37.68% compared to 31.99%.
- Under Pressure: Smith has a slight upper hand in saving breakpoints, managing 49.29% against Zhao's 48.15%. Could this be a decisive factor in key moments?
- Performance Overview: Smith’s win rate over the past year is 48.33%, marginally surpassing Zhao’s 47.17%. Does this suggest a competitive match ahead?
- Best Surface: Smith excels on grass with a 63% win rate, while Zhao performs best on clay with a 55% win rate. Both players perform below their potential on indoor hard courts.
- Player Level: Zhao and Smith have similar success rates in Challenger/ITF tournaments, with Zhao holding a slight edge at 50% versus Smith's 49.15%.
- Opponent Quality: Zhao has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 310.68 compared to Smith’s 385.38.
- Deciding Set Performance: Smith shows greater resilience, winning 58% of deciding sets, whereas Zhao wins 47%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Zhao converts more breakpoints at 46.37% compared to Smith’s 31.91%, indicating a potential advantage in critical situations.
Editorial Prediction (July 11, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the available data reveals that both Smith and Zhao bring distinct strengths and weaknesses to their upcoming match. While Zhao demonstrates slightly superior performance on second serve and return games, Smith counters with better breakpoint saving abilities.
Though the players have a similar win rate in Challenger tournaments, Zhao has consistently competed against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting a potentially higher level of competitiveness. Additionally, Zhao’s ability to convert breakpoint opportunities more efficiently could pose a significant threat to Smith.
However, Smith’s proven ability to perform in deciding sets could be a crucial factor if the match reaches this stage. Taking all these statistics into account, Zhao appears to have a slight edge due to their superior return game and higher quality of competition faced. Therefore, Zhao is likely to secure victory in this matchup, though a closely contested match can be expected.
Carol Zhao vs Alana Smith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Zhao vs A. Smith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:28:51 | Average Match Time | 1:28:51 |
76% (44/58) | 1st Serve % | 60% (46/77) |
68% (30/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (25/46) |
57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (3/3) |
49% (38/77) | Return Points Win % | 34% (20/58) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Zhao Recent Matches Played
A. Smith Recent Matches Played

C. Zhao vs A. Smith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
51.44% (285/269) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.95% (117/122) |
49.96% (646/647) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.18% (270/279) |
49.51% (5886/6003) | Games Win/Loss | 49.96% (2489/2493) |
50.46% (164/161) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (70/70) |
54.26% (70/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.95% (35/38) |
51.35% (38/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.18% (7/10) |
50.00% (13/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
725 | Aces Total | 619 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
2076 | Total Double Faults | 576 |
1:19:7 | Average Match Time | 1:18:34 |
530.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 439.46 |
64% (19267/30324) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7414/12488) |
61% (11838/19267) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4723/7414) |
42% (4643/11057) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2311/5074) |
46% (1665/3608) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (624/1451) |
44% (13359/30096) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5411/12664) |
40.91% (9/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
27.59% (8/21) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
36.84% (28/48) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
56.27% (220/171) | Challenger W/L | 49.23% (96/99) |
58.82% (20/14) | Futures W/L | 54.29% (19/16) |
51% (280/547) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (116/233) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
48% (58/121) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (19/39) |
58% (110/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (37/71) |
85% (254/215) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (113/91) |
15% (254/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (113/22) |
23% (299/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (126/26) |